1.
Click here to see our Grade 7
Unit Draft (Draft #2). (This and subsequent drafts are also listed under "Unit Plan" in "Cognition/Instructional Strategies/Planning" section).
2.
Read Chapter 5
3. Recall our activity from the first day of
class, wherein you were asked to find all possible noncongruent squares on the
11x11 geoboard (dot paper).
a. How can this activity be morphed into a
lesson that is designed to lead students to achieve the following
construct-a-concept objective: "The student geometrically
distinguishes between square roots of perfect squares and square roots of
non-perfect-square whole numbers." (Be creative; there's no
"correct" answer, of course.)
One idea for how to morph this
activity into a construct-a-concept lesson is to allow students to try to solve
question one, then either make sure each student has found or knows how to find
all possible squares. Next I would present them with a tasksheet that has some
different groupings of various squares where they are prompted to find groups
of similar objects (the side length or area could be written in, or you could
pass out rulers and let the students measure, or if you just want them to
visualize the idea geometrically when dealing with a geoboard you wouldn’t need
measurements), where they are categorizing specifics by their attributes (This
is similar to Case 5.6). The point of this is for the students to distinguish
nonexamples from examples of perfect squares, and from this, to find and
describe attributes of perfect squares. Once students have done this, you could
directly teach the connection between roots and square roots, and then allow them
to revisit the previous activity, this time with a focus on finding and
describing attributes of the square roots of perfect squares.
b. How can this activity be morphed into a
lesson that is designed to lead students to achieve the following discover-a-relationship
objective: "The student explains why, for every right triangle, the
square of the length of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of
the lengths of the other two sides." (Be creative; there's no "correct"
answer, of course.)
I believe this lesson needs to be a little
bit more guided than the lesson above. Depending on the time I had to carry out
the lesson, I think I would still have students participate in the activity of
question 1 on the tasksheet because there are applicable insights that could be
gained from this activity. Then I would probably present students with a
tasksheet consisting of questions like the ones included in question D on the
“Geoboard Squares” tasksheet, as shown below:
A.
In the figure at right, find the following in
terms of a and b.
a.
The side of the outside square
b.
The area of the outside square
c.
The area of each triangle
d.
The area of the inside square
e.
The side of the inside square
Previous to these general
questions, however, I would put some examples with actual numbers on the
tasksheet so that students could begin making more tangible connections between
the lengths of the sides of right triangles. With these specific examples, I
would also include more guided about specific relationships between numbers,
but with the general case I would leave the questions more open to allow them
to practice inductively reasoning.
c. How are these two objectives different?
Elaborate.
These two objectives are
different because, in the first case, your purpose is to lead students to
discover for themselves attributes of a concept and to create a definition for
that concept. In the second case, your purpose is to lead students to draw
connections between two things, and to be able to describe the relationship
between those things.
4. Design
a lesson and mini-experiment for a Construct- a-Concept objective from the Unit
Draft you developed last week, and modify the Unit Plan if there is a need. For
more details consult Activity 5.4 p.189, Activity 5.9 p.190, Synthesis Activity
#3 p.206.
Click here to view the lesson plan (can also be found in "Cognition/Instructional Strategies/Planning" section.)
Click here to view the
mini-experiment (can also be found in "Assessment"section.)
5. In
your journal describe the stages of construct-a-concept lesson.
The following are the four
stages of construct-a-concept lessons:
The first stage is “Sorting and Categorizing”. In this
stage, students are given an activity to complete individually (with guidance
from the teacher) that involves them classifying and categorizing specifics,
thereby creating concepts.
The second stage is “Reflecting and Explaining”. In this
stage, students verbalize their logic behind the categories that they created.
As the teacher, you help them to communicate effectively, and stimulate further
ideas on the topic.
The third stage is “Generalizing and Articulating”. In this
stage, students further develop their categorizing through identifying specific
attributes of the given concept. They will also verbalize the attributes of the
concept. The students may develop an informal definition of the concept as
well.
The fourth and final stage is “Verifying and Refining”.
During this stage, the definition of the concept is tested, revised, and/or
verified through examining how examples and nonexamples hold up to the
definition. Stages 1-4 are repeated as the teacher deems necessary.
6. Having completed Geometry Lab 8.5 we started
on first day of class (include it in appropriate folder of your portfolio)
discuss how question 1 differs from Discussion A-D, and D in particular.
The following are
question 1 and questions A-D from the “Geoboard Squares” activity:
1.
There are 33 different-size squares on an 11x11
geoboard. With the hlelp of your neighbors, do the following:
a.
Find all the squares.
b.
Sketch each square on dot paper, indicating its
area and the length of its side.
B.
How can you make sure that two sides of a
geoboard square really form a right angle?
C.
How can you organize your search so as to make
sure you find all the squares?
D.
Is it possible to find squares that have the
same area, but different orientations?
E.
In the figure at right, find the following in
terms of a and b.
a.
The side of the outside square
b.
The area of the outside square
c.
The area of each triangle
d.
The area of the inside square
e.
The side of the inside square
Question 1 differs
from Discussion A-D in that question 1 is a much more open question that allows
students to work through the problem in their own way. In answering question 1,
students are allowed enough freedom that they can practice and refine their
inductive reasoning. On the other hand, questions A-D guide students through
steps of how to solve question 1; they could be viewed as hints to answering
the main problem (question 1). Questions A-D, especially question D, do not
allow students to reason their way through a challenging problem; they are more
so a test of algorithmic skills rather than problem-solving skills.
Kaitlyn,
ReplyDeleteI can see from your unit plan that you're incorporating many ideas from chapter 4. This is a nice unit in development. The balance between inquiry and direct instructional strategies is present, and I can see how each would apply in a lesson with the learning level you assigned them. As it stands, I do not see a whole lot expressions in context, and that may be the lesson level planning, so keep in mind that we write expression to represent certain quantities and how we manipulate them can be more apparent from the context.
I see that you are distinguishing between the two different learning levels in your question 3. It seems to me that in a) there are only two different groupings. You can ask the students to group all the squares in two different groups, as opposed to forming the groups yourself. In b) I see you talking about comprehension and communication a lot more than discover relationship. In particular, where do I see experimenting?
Thanks for including the lesson and the miniepxeriment. I will let you work with your group on modifying and improving your lesson. Quick comment only is that the purpose of mini experiment is to assess, and hence it rules it out from being used as part of constructing a concept. It's the place where you check whether your students constructed a concept.
Emina,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comments! Thanks for the clarity on how we use the word "expression".
For number 3: I have gained a deeper appreciation for allowing students to form the groups themselves, instead of forming them beforehand and having students classify the groups. I think either one of these methods might be particularly useful in specific situation, but in general I think I favor the first. I was planning on having the whole activity of finding different squares on the geoboard be the experimenting part of the lesson. I think it might be good to also have a worksheet that prompts students to make take measurements of the different kinds of squares with a ruler and record their observations. After enough measurements, they may start to discover the relationship for themselves.
Thank you for your input on the mini-experiment. I definitely had an incomplete understanding of mini-experiments before we started working with them in class. I think I was able to grasp the meaning and purpose of them on the day we started discussing them and modified them in our groups.